Case File: 0019-608
Charges: Driving While Prohibited contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Sarah Leamon
Facts: Police officers were conducting routine patrols and using automatic license plate scanning technology when the client’s vehicle came to their attention as their queries indicated that the registered owner was prohibited from driving. A vehicle stop was initiated. Police spoke to the driver, who was identified as the registered owner, and confirmed that they were prohibited from driving for a term of six months. The client was arrested, Chartered and warned. They were released at the scene with a Promise to Appear.
Result: After negotiations with Crown, an agreement was reached wherein the client would plead guilty to the lesser or included offence of driving without a valid drivers’ license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client avoided a one-year driving prohibition. Instead, they were issued with a three-month driving prohibition and a $750 monetary fine.
Case File: 0018-128
Charges: Driving While Prohibited Contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Sarah Leamon
Facts: Police observed a vehicle conduct a prohibited left-hand turn and initiated a traffic stop. Upon speaking with the driver, police detected an odour of liquor on the breath. An Approved Screening Device demand was read and the client provided one ‘fail’ result. The client was issued with a 90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition. Police also determined that the client was prohibited from driving at the time of this event. The client was issued with a Driving While Prohibited charge and given a Promise to Appear.
Result: The client did not dispute the 90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition. However, after negotiation with Crown, an agreement was reached on their Driving While Prohibited matter. The client plead guilty to the lesser or included offence of driving without a valid driver’s license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client was ordered to pay a $1000 fine. They did not receive a driving prohibition.
Case File: 0018-177
Charges: Driving While Prohibited contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Sarah Leamon
Facts: The client had been prohibited indefinitely. They were caught operating a motor vehicle while prohibited and issued with a Promise to Appear.
Result: Defence negotiated with Crown. An agreement was reached wherein the client would plead guilty to the lesser or included offence of driving without a valid driver’s license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client was ordered to pay a $500 fine and a four-month driving prohibition was imposed.
Case File: 0018-215
Charges: Driving While Prohibited contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Sarah Leamon
Facts: The client was stopped for speeding. Upon identifying the driver, police discovered that they were prohibited from driving. They were arrested, Chartered and warned. The client was given a Promise to Appear and released at the scene.
Result: Defence negotiated with Crown. An agreement was reached wherein the client would plead guilty to the lesser or included offence of driving without a valid drivers’ license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client was ordered to pay a $500 fine. No driving prohibition was imposed.
Client Testimonials
Read more reviews from past clients:
Google Reviews or Lawyer Ratingz
Dealing with the Sarah Leamon Law Group was an absolute pleasure. They were friendly and efficient in communicating with me, and dealt with my case in a timely manner. They were thorough and meticulous in putting together a strong case that resulted in a WIN. Highly recommend their services.
K.R., Google Review
Sarah Leamon is amazing! She got back to me right away even though she was out of office! She not only jumped on my file quickly, she also got my prohibition reduced from 7 Months to 3 Months a BIG win in my eyes!!
Lawyer Ratingz Review
From my initial contact with Sarah, providing me with detailed information on next steps, to answering all my questions throughout the process and the representation (thank you, Hyemin!), the service offered by Sarah Leamon Law Group was top notch. Would highly recommend.
S.S., Google Review
Hyemin at Sarah leamon law group is a very respectful, kind, and bright lady. Their team was thorough with my case making the process less worrisome. Would recommend 10/10.
M., Google Review
Have had Sarah as my go-to for any and all my traffic issues. She is very compassionate and is excellent at explaining every part of the process and keeping your stress level way down. Multiple times ive hired Sarah and i am always completely confident she will get the best result, as she has done time and time again. wouldn't go anywhere else, definitely #1 in my eyes!
M.W., Google Review
Dealing with the Sarah Leamon Law Group was an absolute pleasure. They were friendly and efficient in communicating with me, and dealt with my case in a timely manner. They were thorough and meticulous in putting together a strong case that resulted in a WIN. Highly recommend their services.
K.R., Google Review
Sarah Leamon is amazing! She got back to me right away even though she was out of office! She not only jumped on my file quickly, she also got my prohibition reduced from 7 Months to 3 Months a BIG win in my eyes!!
Lawyer Ratingz Review
From my initial contact with Sarah, providing me with detailed information on next steps, to answering all my questions throughout the process and the representation (thank you, Hyemin!), the service offered by Sarah Leamon Law Group was top notch. Would highly recommend.
S.S., Google Review
Hyemin at Sarah leamon law group is a very respectful, kind, and bright lady. Their team was thorough with my case making the process less worrisome. Would recommend 10/10.
M., Google Review
Have had Sarah as my go-to for any and all my traffic issues. She is very compassionate and is excellent at explaining every part of the process and keeping your stress level way down. Multiple times ive hired Sarah and i am always completely confident she will get the best result, as she has done time and time again. wouldn't go anywhere else, definitely #1 in my eyes!
M.W., Google Review
Dealing with the Sarah Leamon Law Group was an absolute pleasure. They were friendly and efficient in communicating with me, and dealt with my case in a timely manner. They were thorough and meticulous in putting together a strong case that resulted in a WIN. Highly recommend their services.
K.R., Google Review
Sarah Leamon is amazing! She got back to me right away even though she was out of office! She not only jumped on my file quickly, she also got my prohibition reduced from 7 Months to 3 Months a BIG win in my eyes!!
Lawyer Ratingz Review
From my initial contact with Sarah, providing me with detailed information on next steps, to answering all my questions throughout the process and the representation (thank you, Hyemin!), the service offered by Sarah Leamon Law Group was top notch. Would highly recommend.
S.S., Google Review
Hyemin at Sarah leamon law group is a very respectful, kind, and bright lady. Their team was thorough with my case making the process less worrisome. Would recommend 10/10.
M., Google Review
Have had Sarah as my go-to for any and all my traffic issues. She is very compassionate and is excellent at explaining every part of the process and keeping your stress level way down. Multiple times ive hired Sarah and i am always completely confident she will get the best result, as she has done time and time again. wouldn't go anywhere else, definitely #1 in my eyes!
M.W., Google Review
Case File: 0019-611
Charges: Driving While Prohibited contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Puneet Klar
Facts: The client had been prohibited from the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a period of four months. During that prohibitory period, the client was stopped for speeding. The officer identified the client as a prohibited driver. The client was arrested, Chartered and warned. They were released at the scene with a Promise to Appear.
Result: After negotiations with Crown, an agreement was reached wherein the client would plead guilty to the lesser or included offence of driving without a valid drivers’ license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client avoided a one-year driving prohibition. Instead, they were issued with a one-month driving prohibition and a $500 monetary fine.
Case File: 0019-701
Charges: Driving While Prohibited contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Sarah Leamon
Facts: The client had been prohibited from driving due to an unsatisfactory driving record and had one previous Driving While Prohibited entry on their record. The client was driving when they were stopped by police for a random license check, which revealed that their license was prohibited. The client was arrested, Chartered and warned. They were released with a Promise to Appear.
Result: The client was facing jail time along with a lengthy driving prohibition and a monetary fine. Counsel negotiated with Crown on behalf of the client and was able to reach an agreement. The client plead guilty to the lesser or included offence of driving without a valid drivers’ license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client avoided jail. Instead, they were issued with a seven-month driving prohibition and a $1000 monetary fine.
Case File: 0018-155
Charges: Driving While Prohibited contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Sarah Leamon
Facts: The client was prohibited from driving by the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles due to an unsatisfactory driving record. The client was prohibited for a period of four months. During his prohibition period, the client was stopped by police after his license plate was queried and returned a prohibited driver status. The client admitted to having no drivers’ license. He was determined to be a prohibited driver and was issued with a Promise to Appear.
Result: After negotiations with Crown, an agreement was reached wherein the client would plead guilty to the lessor or included offence of driving without a valid drivers’ license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client was not required to serve a driving prohibition. Instead, he was simply ordered to pay a $300 fine.
Case File: 0019-621
Charges: Driving While Prohibited contrary to Section 91(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act
Lawyer: Puneet Klar
Facts: The client was observed occupying the drivers’ seat of a parked vehicle in a no-parking zone. A police officer queried the license plate and subsequently observed them driving away. A vehicle stop was initiated and the client was identified. They were determined to be prohibited from driving. They were issued with a Promise to Appear and released at the scene.
Result: After negotiations with Crown, an agreement was reached wherein the client would plead guilty to the lessor or included offence of driving without a valid drivers’ license contrary to Section 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The client received a five-month driving prohibition and a $750 fine.
